In firms whose value depends on the judgement of their people, growth rarely fails because the strategy was wrong. It tends to stall in the spaces between partners, offices and teams, where each unit behaves sensibly on its own and the whole behaves differently. This grouping covers consulting, legal, accounting, advisory, technology and similar organisations. The articles below record patterns observed across them and are organised by organisational pattern rather than by industry label.
Professional services growth: articles on how professional and knowledge-based services experience coordination and consistency as they scale.
This grouping brings together organisations whose value depends on the expertise, judgement and relationships of their people. Consultancies, law and accounting practices, recruitment businesses and technology companies look unrelated from the outside. Organisationally they share a structure: the product is largely what people know and do, and it cannot be separated from the people who deliver it.
That structure means growth is experienced differently from growth in a business that makes or sells goods. Adding people adds capacity, but the judgement, the client knowledge and the standard that made the organisation valuable have to be carried across to them. Coordination that once happened in conversation has to be built into how decisions are made and recorded.
Four places where the organisational pattern is often first noticed. They describe what tends to happen, not a list of faults.
What makes the organisation valuable sits in individuals and transfers slowly.
One measure of performance gradually decides where people spend their time.
Authority is distributed among senior people, and becomes harder to make workable as the organisation grows.
The organisation adds people and functions faster than it adds the means to coordinate them.
Three pressure points where the product is expertise.
When the same people are measured on billable output and expected to build the next year of…
Much of what makes a professional firm valuable sits in individual judgement rather than in…
Research on large companies finds that only 9% of managers say they can rely on colleagues in…
Open any heading to read the full discussion.
When the same people are measured on billable output and expected to build the next year of work, the two aims compete for the same hours. The measured one usually wins, and the cost appears later as a thinner pipeline. The pattern is common wherever time is the unit of value.
The measure is a reasonable proxy for how time is used and a poor one for what the time produced. Organisations that rely on it alone tend to find that the work which sustains them — developing colleagues, building knowledge, looking after clients — is the first to be crowded out.
Much of what makes a professional firm valuable sits in individual judgement rather than in documented method. Client relationships, pricing instinct and quality standards often live with a few senior people, which makes growth, succession and consistency harder to sustain than the plan assumes.
Because tacit judgement is learned by working alongside someone, it is also lost when that person leaves or is promoted away from the work. Growth and acquisition both increase the number of occasions on which it has to be transferred rather than reused.
Research on large companies finds that only 9% of managers say they can rely on colleagues in other functions and units all of the time (Sull, Homkes & Sull, Harvard Business Review, 2015, a study of more than 250 companies). In multi-office professional firms the same gap appears between practices, partners and locations.
In expertise-led organisations, units tend to form around senior individuals with their own methods and client relationships. Coordination between them depends on trust and goodwill more often than on agreed process, which holds while the organisation is small and strains as it grows.
These are the questions the Perspectives keep returning to. They are offered as a way of looking at the organisation, not as a checklist.
Reflections from real work on organisations growing beyond their founding design.
AUTHORITY vs ACCOUNTABILITY
Helping deliver a multi-country, publicly funded pilot inside a local authority shows that formal project…
THE SYSTEM SHOULD OUTLIVE THE FOUNDER
Preparing a fast-growing property network for franchising shows that a business can outgrow its founder’s…
USING YOUR OWN MODEL ON YOURSELF
Helping a shared-employment organisation strengthen its commercial position shows that transformation does not…
Evidence-led reading for professional and knowledge-based organisations.
Their value sits in people and judgement rather than in physical assets, so coordination, incentives and key-person dependence shape growth more than capacity does.
No. It is organised by organisational pattern. Consulting, legal, accounting, technology and other expertise-led firms often face near-identical coordination problems.
No. Scenarios are invented composites. They describe no actual organisation and are not accounts of client work.
Begin with the strategy execution and multi-office articles below, then move to the Perspectives hubs for the wider patterns.
Professional services, recruitment and technology have dedicated pages. Other expertise-led organisations are listed on the Other Sectors page.
Because businesses that look unrelated often face near-identical coordination problems. Grouping by pattern lets readers recognise their situation even when the industry label differs.
Illustrative scenarios on this site are invented composites. They describe no actual organisation and are not accounts of client work.
Related: Multi-Site & Franchise Operations · Asset & Production-Based Organisations · Other Sectors · All Sectors · Markets: London · Zurich · Dubai · Singapore
Services can be delivered remotely, and we accept requests from organisations wherever they are located.
